Image title: Dancers Practicing at the Barre
Medium: Mixed media on canvas
Date: 1877
Source:
The Met Collection
“
By living deeply in the present moment we can understand the past better and we can prepare for a better future.
”
— Thích Nhất Hạnh
Can a Painting Be Alive?: Bio-Art and Living Media in 21st Century Practice
Introduction: Painting the Pulse of Life
In the 21st century, artists are no longer bound by pigment and canvas. The very definition of art is being expanded—respiring and reproducing, shifting and evolving—by a radical group of creators working with living materials like fungi, bacteria, plants, and human cells. These practitioners of bio-art are not just depicting life; they are co-creating with it. The result is a revolutionary convergence of science and aesthetics, asking viewers to reconsider the boundaries between nature and culture, artist and medium, object and organism. Can a painting be alive? The answer lies in the fertile terrain of bio-art, where creativity is not only expressed but cultivated.
1. From Still Life to Living Canvas: Historical Precedents
Art’s relationship with nature has always run deep. The still life genre of the Dutch Golden Age, for instance, was an attempt to capture the ephemeral beauty of flowers, fruit, and fauna—with a quiet nod to mortality and decay. Romantic era painters envisioned wild landscapes pulsing with life and sublimity, while Impressionists like Monet chased the fleeting vibrations of light on water lilies. Yet, all these works adhered to the central paradox: they portrayed dynamism, but were themselves static. It wasn’t until the late 20th century—with the rise of conceptual, performance, and installation art—that artists began to seriously question the material fixity of the art object.
2. Biotechnology and the Artistic Imagination
The late 20th century saw the emergence of biotechnology as a powerful transformative tool—and artists took notice. The 1990s marked a turning point, when developments in genetic engineering, microbiology, and synthetic biology piqued the curiosity of creators eager to collaborate with, rather than simply represent, living systems. One pioneering figure, Eduardo Kac, famously presented “GFP Bunny” (2000), a genetically modified rabbit that glowed green under UV light—made with jellyfish DNA. With this, Kac connected art not to simulation, but to scientific manipulation, entering the realm where ethical, philosophical, and ecological questions could no longer be ignored. Was this still art? Or something stranger: a living artifact of human intention.
3. Living Media: Bacteria, Fungi, and Cell-Based Artworks
Contemporary bio-art has moved beyond shocking audiences with transgenics to developing sustainable, co-evolving systems. Artists such as Heather Dewey-Hagborg use biotechnologies to sculpt speculative portraits from genetic data, while Anicka Yi cultivates colonies of bacteria to create scent-based installations shaped by bodily environments. Meanwhile, Italian artist Carole Collet develops textiles grown from plant cells, envisioning a post-anthropocentric future of regenerative design. Perhaps most evocative are works using fungi—such as mycelium—as sculptural material. These systems are alive, growing, decomposing, and reshaping the gallery as an ecosystem. In these cases, the artwork is not fixed but temporal, emphasizing cycles over permanence.
4. Philosophical Implications: Rethinking the Human
Bio-art challenges deeply held Western ideas about authorship, aesthetics, and autonomy. If an artist facilitates the growth of slime molds on a prepared substrate, who—or what—is the creator? Posthumanist and new materialist thinkers offer frameworks that de-center human dominance in creative processes. Here, consciousness resides not in the logos of the painter, but in the metabolic rhythms of cells. The canvas becomes a petri dish; the aesthetic, a collaboration among species. This shift mirrors broader cultural questions about ecological interdependence, biotechnology ethics, and the boundaries of life itself. In these artworks, agency is decentralized, and creation becomes an emergent, non-linear event.
5. Toward a Living Future: Technology and Sustainability
As climate change and ecological degradation take center stage, bio-art offers more than conceptual intrigue—it offers potential methods for sustainability and resilience. Living materials could one day replace industrial pigments and plastics with biodegradable, regenerative structures. Techno-ecologists are exploring how art and science can mutually inform adaptive systems—“green infrastructures” that evolve alongside human environments. Artists are increasingly partnering with synthetic biologists, not only to critique, but to co-develop bio-design practices. In this convergence, art becomes act, material becomes metabolizing, and culture becomes cultivation.
Conclusion: The Cultivated Canvas
The question “Can a painting be alive?” may once have sounded metaphorical, but today it is a literal inquiry into art’s metamorphic potential. Bio-art is not a mere gimmick; it’s a profound exploration of agency, ethics, and aesthetics at the heart of the Anthropocene. In this fusion of biology and creativity, we find new forms of beauty, strange and breathing—art that sweats, grows, decays, and evolves. It is no longer just about what we make, but how we grow with it.
Useful links:
